who have problems getting on with peers. Pupils will notice who’s in the bench most frequently, and who is left waiting for the longest. They will notice which pupils need teachers’ help due to lack of peer interest.
Efforts to reduce bullying are admirable. However, schools have to be conscious of the potential some bullying programs may inadvertently harm victims. One example is the”buddy bench”, where students who have few friends or are bullied can come to sit and be encouraged by peers.
Like many Australian programs, KiVa provides teachers with activities and lessons to teach students how to relate to each other, such as how to assist if they detect bullying.
Got no friends? Sit on the buddy bench.’
The notion is that other kids or teachers will see the pupil on the bench and supply aid. Regardless of the positive objective, there is no evidence this strategy works, and there are many things that can fail.
School programs to reduce bullying tend to be based on concept. Very few of the programs offered to Australian colleges have been scientifically evaluated for effectiveness.
How do programs affect sufferers?
International research demonstrates bullying prevention programs can reduce victimisation at school degree by up to 16%. But programs that decrease whole-school bullying may still lead to worse outcomes for victims
While the notion is fine in theory, it might have some very unwanted outcomes.
Around 15% of Australian school pupils experience bullying in a school year. Being bullied increases that the danger of ongoing depression and anxiety.
Most colleges in Australia have installed friend chairs , or friendship seats. These playground benches are intended to give a secure place in the playground in which a student can go when bullied or whenever they don’t have any one to play with.
All Australian states have policies to tackle school bullying. And lots of schools also run instructional programs aimed at preventing bullying.
KiVa has been found to decrease bullying at the school level in primary schools. But a Dutch study contrasted schools that had embraced KiVa with schools that worked off their customary bullying policies (the control group). Researchers found schools using the program place did reduce bullying overall. But the children in those schools that remained bullied, or became new victims of bullying, were more depressed and had lower self-esteem compared to bullying victims at the hands schools.Researchers theorised that if fewer pupils were bullied, those who stayed bullied were more visible to peers, leading to rejection. The exact same theory suggests elements in college programs that create a pupil’s victim status more visible to peers may also cause increased stigmatisation.